Should you be concerned about your right to utilizing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or surrogacy as a way to grow your family? Well, it all depends on what happens with current legislation pending in Congress and around the country.There are two bills now in committee in the US House of Representatives that would essentially give legal rights to fertilized eggs- which is also known as “Personhood” legislation. HR 681, “Life at Conception Act”, is sponsored by Congressman Alex Mooney (R-W.Va.) and co-sponsored by 59 Republicans and 1 Democrat (Rep. Collin Peterson of Minnesota).
The same bill was introduced on the Senate side as S231 by Senator Paul Rand (R-Ky.) and currently has 9 Republican co-sponsors.
A similar bill, HR 586, the “Sanctity of Human Life Act”, was introduced by Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.). It’s co-sponsored by 29 other Republican men from 14 states and the list of co-sponsors continues to grow.
There are currently 10 states – Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, South Carolina, Missouri, Washington, Tennessee and Texas – with Personhood legislation pending.
This type of legislation is nothing new and has been introduced in some form every year since the mid-1990’s. However, this year, we have a combination of a Republican dominated Congress and publicly pro-life Vice President. In January, Mike Pence became the highest ranking US official to ever speak at the March for Life rally in Washington.
“There is strong support for the introduction of pro-life legislation with this new administration,” Los Angeles Reproductive Law Attorney Lori Meyers says, “There is a feeling of momentum from the White House that has buoyed support for the introduction of bills with this kind of broad, strong and sweeping language, which I don’t think most people are necessarily aware of, or understand the complexities of.”
Congressman Jody Hice sent us this statement: “Today, with the right to life under attack, now more than ever before, we must stand up as advocates for the unborn. Our culture must affirm the value of the weak and vulnerable in our society, beginning with our children. With that in mind, I introduced the Sanctity of Human Life Act, which rightly defines life as beginning at conception.”
Infertility, IVF, explaining IVFThose who support the bill say it’s a declaration, not a regulation and does not mention or prohibit IVF or any other assisted reproductive technology, it simply states that life begins at conception. Even so, many in the fertility community are very concerned.
Dr. Andrew Toledo, a Fertility Specialist in Atlanta, was part of a coalition of physicians who fought 2009 Georgia state legislation which intended to recognize and give legal human rights to embryos. “For these pro-life politicians, this is the way to eliminate abortion and Roe v. Wade. However, I don’t think the majority of politicians realize the impact it will have on the reproductive field. The process of in vitro fertilization creates embryos. Doctors can’t know how many eggs will fertilize. If I have ten eggs, will all fertilize, or just two? We don’t know. Additionally, not all of the embryos created will be genetically normal. So, would this legislation force a couple to implant all embryos, whether or not they are normal, because discarding them would be illegal?”
Fertility Specialist Dr. Eli Reshef has been an active part of the fight against “Life at Conception” legislation in his state of Oklahoma. While Oklahoma does not support Surrogacy and has numerous laws restricting access to abortion, previous attempts at passing Personhood legislation have failed. “It creates a significant risk to family-building,” Reshef says. “Giving embryos the same rights as adults creates various situations that place the practice of IVF at risk. If a lab technician accidentally drops a dish with embryos, they may be prosecuted for manslaughter of “persons”. Which IVF practice, in its right mind, would be willing to provide services if they entail risks of legal prosecution? What about ectopic pregnancies that are viable and place the pregnant person’s health at risk, yet surgical or medical intervention may be construed as killing a ‘person’?”
Attorney Lori Meyers says the proposed legislation would also impact surrogacy in states where it’s legal: “We may be unable to put directed sections in our legal contracts for abortion or selective reduction as the unborn fetus would have rights. Currently, if a surrogate’s life is ever threatened, her life comes first and she decides the outcome of the pregnancy. In the event an abnormality is detected, the Intended Parents have the right to determine the outcome of the pregnancy, as well as to make selective reduction decisions in the event of multiples, or triplets, or more, which is considered a very high-risk pregnancy, endangering the lives of the fetuses and surrogate. It may put lawyers in the position of having to eliminate these sections and the rights of Intended Parents completely, causing them to lose control of the outcome of the pregnancy.”
National organizations like RESOLVE The National Infertility Association, Center for Reproductive Rights, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine all have a long history of lobbying against Personhood legislation on the Federal and State levels.
Barbara Collura, President and CEO of RESOLVE, says: “Since 2008, more than 26 states have introduced Personhood bills or ballot initiatives. So far in 2017, we are tracking 11 bills in 9 states. For comparison, in 2016 we tracked 7 Personhood bills. Typically anti-abortion legislation increases with Republicans in the majority.”
“Obstetricians, gynecologists and fertility specialists need to work together to make their voice known to legislators, because they will listen to whoever is talking,” Dr. Toledo says. “It all starts with education – educating people who would be affected by this legislation and the Congressmen who represent them.”
“I’m genuinely worried about the speed and power of bills that could wipe out fundamental rights before most people are aware of it.” Meyers says, “Decisions involving pregnancy and infertility are highly personal and private. As attorneys in this field, we have to be prepared to fight for the rights of our clients and patients struggling to create their families in a safe and private environment, uncontrolled by governmental influence.”
“People should be reaching out to their lawmakers to share their perspective and expertise so that the bill does not move,” Collura says. “You never know who will support Personhood, as we have seen pro-life state lawmakers oppose it once they were educated about the far-reaching implications. I like to think that given the chance to tell them the impact, reasonable people will oppose it. So far no Personhood bill or ballot initiative has passed at the state level despite the appearance of overwhelming odds favoring it.”
Dr. Toledo has advice for physicians, particularly in the red states where this type of legislation has come up for debate before: “You need to be organized and have a lobbyist who can get the ear of the party in power, one that has connections and the ability to get inside the offices of the Governor and state legislators.”
Dr. Reshef says it’s also important how you approach the discussion: “Appeal to the sense of decency- most people, including legislators, have some left. Appeal in the name of core values like family-building and the right to raise children. Most people, no matter their political affiliation, understand and support these values.”
Collura encourages people who are concerned about their reproductive rights to use this as an opportunity to get to know their representatives and senators: “Share with them why you are opposed to Personhood. And if you are pro-life, that is a powerful message for them to hear ‘I am pro-life but against Personhood!’ Your voice can make a big difference.” RESOLVE offers this handy tool as an easy way to contact your US Representatives and voice your opposition to the Personhood legislation.